BioGPS
  • Home
  • Help
  • Plugins
  • Datasets
  • Sign Up
  • Login
Examples: Gene Symbol(s), Gene Ontology, Splicing plugins, Melanoma datasets
advanced
Home › Dataset Library › Gene Expression Profiles in Thermally Injured Human Skin: A Temporal Microarray Analysis

Dataset: Gene Expression Profiles in Thermally Injured Human Skin: A Temporal Microarray Analysis

Thermal injury incites inflammatory responses that often transcend the local environment and lead to structural deficiencies in skin that...

Registered by ArrayExpress Uploader
View Dataset

Thermal injury incites inflammatory responses that often transcend the local environment and lead to structural deficiencies in skin that give way to scar formation. We hypothesized that extensive perturbations within burned skin following thermal insult and during subsequent events of wound repair induce vast alterations in gene expression that likely serve as a wound and systemic healing deterrent. A high-throughput microarray experiment was designed to analyze genetic expression patterns and identify potential genes to target for therapeutic augmentation or silencing. The study compares gene expression from burn wound margins at various times following thermal injury to expression observed in normal skin. Utilizing this design, we report that the totality of gene expression alterations is indeed enormous. Further, we observed that the differential expression of many inflammatory and immune response genes appear to be continually up-regulated in burn wound margins seven days or more after initial thermal insult. As it is well established that the inflammatory process must abate for wound healing to proceed, the finding of ongoing local inflammation is cause for further investigation. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the gene expression alterations induced by thermal injury of human skin. As such, it provides a wealth of data to mine with the ultimate goal of better understanding the local pathophysiologic changes at the site of thermal injury that not only affect wound healing capacity, but may also contribute to systemic derangements within the burn patient. Keywords: time course, disease state analysis The study compares gene expression from burn wound margins at various times following thermal injury to expression observed in normal skin. All skin specimens were obtained in the operating room within minutes of being removed from the patient. Burn specimens were taken from wound margins. Harvested tissue at the burn wound margin maximized the capture of viable cells from the multiple lineages important to the healing process and minimized the inclusion of non-viable cells destroyed by full-thickness injury. After isolation, RNA samples were pooled equally by mass as to contain RNA from 5 tissue specimens for each array replicate.

Species:
human

Samples:
12

Source:
E-GEOD-8056

Updated:
Dec.12, 2014

Registered:
Sep.22, 2014


Factors: (via ArrayExpress)
Sample POST BURN DAY PROCEDURE MEDIAN AGE SEX TOTAL BODY SURFACE ARE BURNED MEAN AGE
GSM198866 1; 2; 3; 3; 3 excision, left hand; excision, back; excision, right upper extremity; excision, back; excision, right thigh 42 F; M; F; M; F 2%; 10%; 3%; 50%; 4% 44.2
GSM198867 3; 3; 3; 3; 3 excision, abdomen; excision, right arm; excision, bilateral lower extremities; excision, back; excision, left hand 39 F; F; M; M; M 30%; 40%; 23%; 20%; 2% 42.8
GSM198868 1; 2; 3; 3; 3 excision, abdomen; excision, left lower extremity; excision, abdomen; excision, right foot; excision, left upper extremity 51 F; M; M; F; M 80%; 5%; 15%; 3%; 15% 48.0
GSM198869 4; 4; 4; 5; 5 excision, right upper extremity; excision, right upper extremity; excision, right flank; excision, chest; excision, chest 30 M; M; M; F; F 6%; 8%; 10%; 5%; 15% 27.0
GSM198870 4; 4; 6; 7; 7 excision, trunk; excision, left upper extremity; excision, right lower extremity; excision, trunk; excision, back 33 M; M; F; F; M 30%; 4%; 8%; 25%; 20% 32.8
GSM19887 4; 5; 5; 6; 6 excision, abdomen; excision, right upper extremity; excision, abdomen; excision, back; excision, right upper extremity 42 M; M; M; M; M 50%; 10%; 27%; 5%; 5% 42.8
GSM198872 8; 9; 9; 9; 11 excision, right lower extremity; excision, left foot; excision, abdomen; excision, right foot; excision, left upper extremity 40 M; M; M; M; M 60%; 10%; 50%; 5%; 45% 46.0
GSM198873 10; 12; 13; 14; 17 excision, right abdomen; excision, back; excision, chest; excision, right lower extremity; excision, right upper extremity 30 M; M; M; M; F 20%; 15%; 50%; 12%; 33% 36.2
GSM198874 8; 12; 14; 15; 16 excision, right upper extremity; excision, chest; excision, right lower extremity; excision, right foot; excision, right hand 33 M; M; F; M; M 20%; 10%; 5%; 3%; 45% 37.8
GSM198875 nan reduction mammoplasty; reduction mammoplasty; blepharoplasty; reduction mammoplasty; excision of redundant tissue (back) 26 F; F; F; F; F 0% (all samples) 28.8
GSM198876 nan reduction mammoplasty; reduction mammoplasty; reduction mammoplasty; reduction mammoplasty; thigh lift 44 F; F; F; F; F 0% (all samples) 45.4
GSM198877 nan blepharoplasty; blepharoplasty; reduction mammoplasty; split-thickness skin grafting; blepharoplasty 51 F; M; F; M; F 0% (all samples) 44.2

Tags

  • disease
  • skin

Other Formats

JSON    XML
  • About
  • Blog
  • Help
  • FAQ
  • Downloads
  • API
  • iPhone App
  • Email updates
© 2025 The Scripps Research Institute. All rights reserved. (ver 94eefe6 )
  • Terms of Use