BioGPS
  • Home
  • Help
  • Plugins
  • Datasets
  • Sign Up
  • Login
Examples: Gene Symbol(s), Gene Ontology, Splicing plugins, Melanoma datasets
advanced
Home › Dataset Library › Transcriptional effects of 1,25 dihydroxi-vitamin D3 physiological and supra-physiological concentrations in breast cancer organotypic...

Dataset: Transcriptional effects of 1,25 dihydroxi-vitamin D3 physiological and supra-physiological concentrations in breast cancer organotypic culture

Vitamin D may have anti-tumorigenic actions by influencing the gene expression profile of target tissues, which possess vitamin D...

Registered by ArrayExpress Uploader
View Dataset

Vitamin D may have anti-tumorigenic actions by influencing the gene expression profile of target tissues, which possess vitamin D receptors. We used a more physiological in vitro model, represented by short-term culture of breast cancer tissue slices, to study the transcriptional effects of a near physiological concentration of calcitriol. Methods. Breast cancer fragments were sliced and maintained in culture for 24 hours in the presence or absence (control) of calcitriol 0.5nM or 100nM (called physiological or supra-physiological concentrations). Five and 16 samples were included in a test or validation group and gene expression was analyzed by microarray (using SAM paired analysis) or qPCR, respectively. Results. Nine genes were regulated by calcitriol 0.5nM including CYP24A1, DPP4, EFTUD1 (FDR£0.01), which were up-modulated. However, using a less stringent FDR value (0.25) 61 genes were differentially expressed. Among the down-regulated transcripts were members of the MHC class II complex (HLA-DPA1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQA2, HLA-DQB1, HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DRB3) and IgG binding (FCGR2A, FCGR2B, FCGR2C). There was an enrichment of genes presenting transcription factor binding sites for vitamin D, among the up-regulated genes and for interferon regulatory factor IRF1, among the down-regulated genes. Analyzing calcitriol supra-physiological effects, a more impressive transcriptional modulation was identified and 136 and 60 genes (FDR 0.1) were more and less expressed in treated samples. Up-regulated genes were involved in vitamin metabolic process, regulation of leukocyte-mediated immunity and positive regulation of alpha-beta T cell activation. Many of the induced genes were already reported as vitamin D responsive genes, including CD14, which was also up-regulated in another set of 16 samples. Genes modulated by both calcitriol concentrations were CYP24A1, DPP4, CA2 (these three in both sets of samples), EFTUD1, TKTL1, KCNK3. Conclusion. Small increments in calcitriol concentration, within the physiological range, for a relatively short period of time may exert transcriptional effects in breast cancer samples. Further studies employing physiological concentrations of vitamin D for longer periods of time may help to elucidate the hormone effects in breast cancer treatment and prevention. Breast cancer fragments were sliced and maintained in culture for 24 hours in the presence or absence (control) of calcitriol 0.5nM or 100nM (called physiological or supra-physiological concentrations). Five samples were included and were categorized according to treatment in three groups: control (A), 1,25(OH)2D3 0.5nM (B) and 1,25(OH)2D3 100nM (C).Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy kit and than was carried out according to microarray Affymetrix protocol. Data was then assessed with GeneSpring X software for background correction, normalization and summarization of raw data (CEL files) using the Robust Multi-Array Average (RMA). Five samples were included in a test and gene expression was analyzed by microarray (using SAM paired analysis). To establish a differential gene expression profile between vitamin D treated and untreated samples, SAM two class paired, provided on MEV (MultiExperiment Viewer – Boston, MA, USA) was used. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on Euclidean distance and average linkage was used to verify association patterns. The reliability of the clustering was assessed by the Bootstrap technique using MEV (MultiExperiment Viewer – Boston, MA, USA). Samples (16) were included in a validation group and was analyzed by qPCR.

Species:
human

Samples:
15

Source:
E-GEOD-27220

Updated:
Dec.12, 2014

Registered:
Sep.15, 2014


Factors: (via ArrayExpress)
Sample AGE CLINICAL STAGE AGENT
GSM672818 70 III none
GSM672819 74 III none
GSM672820 56 none
GSM67282 56 II none
GSM672822 76 III none
GSM672823 70 III VitaminD_0.5nM
GSM672824 74 III VitaminD_0.5nM
GSM672825 56 VitaminD_0.5nM
GSM672826 56 II VitaminD_0.5nM
GSM672827 76 III VitaminD_0.5nM
GSM672828 70 III VitaminD_100nM
GSM672829 74 III VitaminD_100nM
GSM672830 56 VitaminD_100nM
GSM67283 56 II VitaminD_100nM
GSM672832 76 III VitaminD_100nM

Tags

  • breast
  • breast cancer
  • cancer
  • cell
  • class
  • hormone
  • leukocyte

Other Formats

JSON    XML
  • About
  • Blog
  • Help
  • FAQ
  • Downloads
  • API
  • iPhone App
  • Email updates
© 2025 The Scripps Research Institute. All rights reserved. (ver 94eefe6 )
  • Terms of Use