BioGPS
  • Home
  • Help
  • Plugins
  • Datasets
  • Sign Up
  • Login
Examples: Gene Symbol(s), Gene Ontology, Splicing plugins, Melanoma datasets
advanced
Home › Dataset Library › Differential regulation of extracellular matrix constituents in compensated versus decompensated heart failure following pressure overload

Dataset: Differential regulation of extracellular matrix constituents in compensated versus decompensated heart failure following pressure overload

The aim of the present study was to examine potential differences in the regulation of myocardial ECM constituents, in mice that develop...

Registered by ArrayExpress Uploader
View Dataset

The aim of the present study was to examine potential differences in the regulation of myocardial ECM constituents, in mice that develop hypertrophy only (ABnonHF) and in mice that develop overt heart failure (ABHF) as response to pressure overload. Seven weeks old male C57BL/6 mice were subjected to aortic banding (AB) or sham operation (sAB), with sacrifice 4 weeks after banding. Prior to sacrifice, cardiac function and geometry were evaluated by echocardiography. Animals with comparable gradients over the banded ascending aorta, comparable cardiac output and heart rate were divided into two groups: ABnonHF and ABHF. Our criterion for dividing AB animals into these two groups was based on lung weight and left atrial diameter (LAD), as an increase in these parameters most likely is due to pulmonary congestion. Heart failure (HF) was defined as an increase in lung weight and LAD defining ABnonHF as lung weight/tibia length ≤ 10.5 mg/mm and LAD ≤ 2.0 mm and ABHF as lung weight/tibia length ≥ 15 mg/mm and LAD ≥ 2.4 mm. Microarray screening was performed in 7 mice from each AB group and in 5 sAB mice. Sham was used as control.

Species:
mouse

Samples:
19

Source:
E-GEOD-36074

Updated:
Dec.12, 2014

Registered:
Nov.12, 2014


Factors: (via ArrayExpress)
Sample RIGHT VENTRICLE WEIGHT MG ENDING LEFT VENTRICULAR WEIGHT MG LTINDEX TREATMENT TIBIA LENGTH MM OUTCOME LUNG WEIGHT MG STARTING LEFT VENTRICULAR WEIGHT MG
GSM880736 0.0245 7.59 9.19 Aorta banding 17.19 no heart failure 0.1579 0.1304
GSM880737 0.0245 6.42 10.83 Aorta banding 17.34 no heart failure 0.1878 0.1114
GSM880738 0.0279 7.21 9.03 Aorta banding 17.88 no heart failure 0.1614 0.129
GSM880739 0.0211 7.13 8.71 Aorta banding 17.4 no heart failure 0.1516 0.124
GSM880740 0.0236 6.47 8.82 Aorta banding 17.47 no heart failure 0.1541 0.1131
GSM88074 0.0218 7.27 8.52 Aorta banding 17.75 no heart failure 0.1513 0.1291
GSM880742 0.0197 6.78 8.58 Aorta banding 17.51 no heart failure 0.1502 0.1187
GSM880743 0.041 9.75 20.9 Aorta banding 17.86 heart failure 0.3732 0.1741
GSM880744 0.0359 8.69 17.92 Aorta banding 17.72 heart failure 0.3175 0.154
GSM880745 0.039 9.39 24.62 Aorta banding 18.25 heart failure 0.4494 0.1714
GSM880746 0.0295 8.09 19.28 Aorta banding 17.48 heart failure 0.337 0.1415
GSM880747 0.0396 8.66 20.48 Aorta banding 17.4 heart failure 0.3564 0.1506
GSM880748 0.0296 8.63 18.76 Aorta banding 17.06 heart failure 0.32 0.1472
GSM880749 0.0374 9.58 21.1 Aorta banding 17.21 heart failure 0.3632 0.1648
GSM880750 0.0266 5.34 8.75 SHAM 17.75 SHAM 0.1553 0.0947
GSM88075 0.0236 4.82 8.27 SHAM 17.64 SHAM 0.1458 0.085
GSM880752 0.0294 5.03 8.33 SHAM 17.92 SHAM 0.1492 0.0901
GSM880753 0.0221 5.47 9.38 SHAM 17.96 SHAM 0.1684 0.0983
GSM880754 0.0218 5.06 8.2 SHAM 17.52 SHAM 0.1437 0.0886

Tags

  • aorta
  • ascending aorta
  • heart
  • left
  • lung
  • tibia

Other Formats

JSON    XML
  • About
  • Blog
  • Help
  • FAQ
  • Downloads
  • API
  • iPhone App
  • Email updates
© 2025 The Scripps Research Institute. All rights reserved. (ver 94eefe6 )
  • Terms of Use