<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ASCII"?>
<biogps><data><item key="owner">ArrayExpress Uploader</item><item key="pop_total">0</item><item key="species">mouse</item><item key="factors"><item><item key="GSE16522GSM415024"/></item><item><item key="GSE16522GSM415025"/></item><item><item key="GSE16522GSM415026"/></item><item><item key="GSE16522GSM415027"/></item><item><item key="GSE16522GSM415028"/></item><item><item key="GSE16522GSM415029"/></item><item><item key="GSE16522GSM415030"/></item><item><item key="GSE16522GSM415031"/></item><item><item key="GSE16522GSM415032"/></item><item><item key="GSE16522GSM415033"/></item><item><item key="GSE16522GSM415034"/></item></item><item key="id">5717</item><item key="ownerprofile_id">arrayexpress_sid</item><item key="platform">6</item><item key="summary_wrapped">Effector cells for adoptive immunotherapy can be generated by in vitro stimulation of na&#239;ve or memory subsets of CD8+ T cells. While the...</item><item key="geo_gse_id">E-GEOD-16522</item><item key="owner_profile">/profile/8773/arrayexpressuploader</item><item key="factor_count">0</item><item key="sample_count">11</item><item key="tags"><item>cancer</item><item>cell</item><item>central</item><item>cytokine</item></item><item key="lastmodified">Dec.12, 2014</item><item key="is_default">False</item><item key="geo_gds_id"/><item key="slug">transcription-profiling-of-mouse-effector-cells-de</item><item key="geo_id_plat">E-GEOD-16522_A-AFFY-45</item><item key="name">Transcription profiling of mouse effector cells derived from naive or central memory pmel-1 CD8+ T cells</item><item key="created">Nov.11, 2014</item><item key="summary">Effector cells for adoptive immunotherapy can be generated by in vitro stimulation of na&#239;ve or memory subsets of CD8+ T cells. While the characteristics of CD8+ T cell subsets are well defined, the heritable influence of those populations on their effector cell progeny is not well understood. We studied effector cells generated from na&#239;ve or central memory CD8+ T cells and found that they retained distinct gene expression signatures and developmental programs. Effector cells derived from central memory cells tended to retain their CD62L+ phenotype, but also to acquire KLRG1, an indicator of cellular senescence. In contrast, the effector cell progeny of na&#239;ve cells displayed reduced terminal differentiation, and, following infusion, they displayed greater expansion, cytokine production, and tumor destruction. These data indicate that effector cells retain a gene expression imprint conferred by their na&#239;ve or central memory progenitors, and they suggest a strategy for enhancing cancer immunotherapy. Experiment Overall Design: Effector cells were generated from naive or central memory CD8+ T cells. The cells were then rested (unstimulated) or restimulated (stimulated). This experimental design resulted in 4 groups (Na&#239;ve-derived/stimulated, Na&#239;ve-derived/unstimulated, Central memory-derived/stimulated, Central memory-derived/unstimulated). Three replicates from independent experiments were analyzed.</item><item key="source">http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-GEOD-16522</item><item key="sample_source">http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-GEOD-16522/samples/</item></data></biogps>
