<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ASCII"?>
<biogps><data><item key="owner">ArrayExpress Uploader</item><item key="pop_total">0</item><item key="id">8412</item><item key="factors"><item><item key="GSM402542"><item key="environmental history">ad libitum chow during pregnancy and suckling</item></item></item><item><item key="GSM402542"><item key="environmental history">ad libitum chow during pregnancy and suckling</item></item></item><item><item key="GSM402542"><item key="environmental history">ad libitum chow during pregnancy and suckling</item></item></item><item><item key="GSM402542"><item key="environmental history">ad libitum chow during pregnancy and suckling</item></item></item><item><item key="GSM402542"><item key="environmental history">ad libitum chow during pregnancy and suckling</item></item></item><item><item key="GSM402547"><item key="environmental history">undernutrition during pregnancy, ad libitum chow during suckling</item></item></item><item><item key="GSM402547"><item key="environmental history">undernutrition during pregnancy, ad libitum chow during suckling</item></item></item><item><item key="GSM402547"><item key="environmental history">undernutrition during pregnancy, ad libitum chow during suckling</item></item></item><item><item key="GSM402547"><item key="environmental history">undernutrition during pregnancy, ad libitum chow during suckling</item></item></item><item><item key="GSM402547"><item key="environmental history">undernutrition during pregnancy, ad libitum chow during suckling</item></item></item><item><item key="GSM402552"><item key="environmental history">undernutrition during pregnancy and suckling</item></item></item><item><item key="GSM402552"><item key="environmental history">undernutrition during pregnancy and suckling</item></item></item><item><item key="GSM402552"><item key="environmental history">undernutrition during pregnancy and suckling</item></item></item><item><item key="GSM402552"><item key="environmental history">undernutrition during pregnancy and suckling</item></item></item></item><item key="ownerprofile_id">arrayexpress_sid</item><item key="platform">8</item><item key="summary_wrapped">OBJECTIVE: To characterize the hormonal milieu and adipose gene expression in response to catch-up growth (CUG), a growth pattern...</item><item key="pubmed_id">19208909</item><item key="geo_gse_id">E-GEOD-16083</item><item key="owner_profile">/profile/8773/arrayexpressuploader</item><item key="factor_count">1</item><item key="sample_count">14</item><item key="tags"><item>adipocyte</item><item>adipose tissue</item><item>body</item><item>cell</item><item>insulin</item><item>obesity</item><item>serum</item></item><item key="lastmodified">Dec.12, 2014</item><item key="is_default">False</item><item key="geo_gds_id"/><item key="slug">transcription-profiling-by-array-of-mice-after-in</item><item key="geo_id_plat">E-GEOD-16083_A-AFFY-36</item><item key="name">Transcription profiling by array of mice after in utero undernutrition and/or undernutrition during suckling</item><item key="created">Nov.24, 2014</item><item key="summary">OBJECTIVE: To characterize the hormonal milieu and adipose gene expression in response to catch-up growth (CUG), a growth pattern associated with obesity and diabetes risk, in a mouse model of low birth weight (LBW). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ICR mice were food restricted by 50% from gestational days 12.5-18.5, reducing offspring birth weight by 25%. During the suckling period, dams were either fed ad libitum, permitting CUG in offspring, or food restricted, preventing CUG. Offspring were killed at age 3 weeks, and gonadal fat was removed for RNA extraction, array analysis, RT-PCR, and evaluation of cell size and number. Serum insulin, thyroxine (T4), corticosterone, and adipokines were measured. RESULTS: At age 3 weeks, LBW mice with CUG (designated U-C) had body weight comparable with controls (designated C-C); weight was reduced by 49% in LBW mice without CUG (designated U-U). Adiposity was altered by postnatal nutrition, with gonadal fat increased by 50% in U-C and decreased by 58% in U-U mice (P &lt; 0.05 vs. C-C mice). Adipose expression of the lipogenic genes Fasn, AccI, Lpin1, and Srebf1 was significantly increased in U-C compared with both C-C and U-U mice (P &lt; 0.05). Mitochondrial DNA copy number was reduced by &gt;50% in U-C versus U-U mice (P = 0.014). Although cell numbers did not differ, mean adipocyte diameter was increased in U-C and reduced in U-U mice (P &lt; 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CUG results in increased adipose tissue lipogenic gene expression and adipocyte diameter but not increased cellularity, suggesting that catch-up fat is primarily associated with lipogenesis rather than adipogenesis in this murine model. Epididymal fat samples were obtained at age 3 weeks from 5 control mice (CC), 5 mice exposed to in utero undernutrition (UC), and 4 mice exposed to undernutrition in utero and during suckling (UU).</item><item key="source">http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-GEOD-16083</item><item key="species">mouse</item><item key="sample_source">http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-GEOD-16083/samples/</item></data></biogps>
